Systems, methods and computer programs for customized natural language processing and searching based on technical terms within electronic documents

ABSTRACT

Methods, systems, and computer readable media concern natural language processing and searching for identifying biological products in an electronic document. The method includes extracting, from the electronic document, a candidate text phrase representing a potential biological product reference in the electronic document and parsing the candidate text phrase into a syntactic structure including one or more terms. The method includes tagging each of the one or more terms in the syntactic structure with a vocabulary tag. The vocabulary tag represents a technical meaning of a term in the potential biological product reference. The method includes calculating a total score for the candidate text phrase based on relative tag scores associated with each vocabulary tag for the one or more terms. The method includes classifying the candidate text phrase as a biological product reference and includes searching a database for one or more product entries based on the biological product references.

TECHNICAL FIELD

This application generally relates to methods, systems, and computerreadable media for searching for terms in a document.

INTRODUCTION

Currently, when a scientist or other reader is viewing or reading adocument such as a scientific paper in a technical field, such asbiology, the reader may desire to identify various scientific referencesin the document and potential products associated with the references.For instance, the reader may be viewing a scientific paper that concernsthe use of specific antibodies, and the reader may desire to identifythe antibody references in the document and also products associatedwith the antibody references. The reader, however, may not be able toeasily identify the references. For example, in the scientific field,differing documents often use different terminology in describing thesame biological product references, such as antibody references forexample. For instance, different authors may utilize differentterminology when describing an antibody reference. Also, for instance,the different purveyors of biological products may utilize differentnames and terminology for their products. Furthermore, authors mayaccidently alter, misidentify or combine different terminology inreferring to products used within a study based on the differences inreferring to the same or similar biological products in the technicalfield and/or by different purveyors of products within the technicalfield. As such, it may be difficult for a reader or other recipient ofthe information in the document to properly identify the referenceseither manually or automatically.

SUMMARY

Exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure may solve one or more ofthe above-mentioned problems and/or may demonstrate one or more of theabove-mentioned desirable features. Other features and/or advantages maybecome apparent from the description that follows.

In one exemplary embodiment, a method concerns natural languageprocessing and searching for identifying biological products in anelectronic document. The method includes extracting, from the electronicdocument, a candidate text phrase representing a potential biologicalproduct reference in the electronic document. The method also includesparsing the candidate text phrase into a syntactic structure includingone or more terms. The parsing filters the one or more terms in thesyntactic structure according to a syntactic role of the one or moreterms relative to a technical field associated with the potentialbiological product reference. Further, the method includes tagging eachof the one or more terms in the syntactic structure with a vocabularytag. The vocabulary tag represents a technical meaning of a term in thepotential biological product reference. The method additionally includescalculating a total score for the candidate text phrase based onrelative tag scores associated with each vocabulary tag for the one ormore terms. The relative tag scores represent a relative confidencestrength of each vocabulary tag in the potential biological productreference. The method also includes classifying the candidate textphrase as a biological product reference based on the total scoreexceeding a threshold. Additionally, the method includes searching adatabase for one or more product entries based on the biological productreferences, with these one or more product entries then retrieved fromthe database for potential use in providing one or more productrecommendations for the biological product reference.

In another exemplary embodiment, a non-transitory computer readablemedium stores instructions for performing a method of natural languageprocessing and searching for identifying biological products in anelectronic document. The method includes extracting, from the electronicdocument, a candidate text phrase representing a potential biologicalproduct reference in the electronic document. The method also includesparsing the candidate text phrase into a syntactic structure includingone or more terms. The parsing filters the one or more terms in thesyntactic structure according to a syntactic role of the one or moreterms relative to a technical field associated with the potentialbiological product reference. Further, the method includes tagging eachof the one or more terms in the syntactic structure with a vocabularytag. The vocabulary tag represents a technical meaning of a term in thepotential biological product reference. The method additionally includescalculating a total score for the candidate text phrase based onrelative tag scores associated with each vocabulary tag for the one ormore terms. The relative tag scores represent a relative confidencestrength of each vocabulary tag in the potential biological productreference. The method also includes classifying the candidate textphrase as a biological product reference based on the total scoreexceeding a threshold. Additionally, the method includes searching adatabase for one or more product entries based on the biological productreferences, with these one or more product entries then retrieved fromthe database for potential use in providing one or more productrecommendations for the biological product reference.

In another exemplary embodiment, a system includes one or more memorydevices storing instructions, and one or more processors coupled to theone or more memory devices and configured to execute the instruction toperform a method of natural language processing and searching foridentifying biological products in an electronic document. The methodincludes extracting, from the electronic document, a candidate textphrase representing a potential biological product reference in theelectronic document. The method also includes parsing the candidate textphrase into a syntactic structure including one or more terms. Theparsing filters the one or more terms in the syntactic structureaccording to a syntactic role of the one or more terms relative to atechnical field associated with the potential biological productreference. Further, the method includes tagging each of the one or moreterms in the syntactic structure with a vocabulary tag. The vocabularytag represents a technical meaning of a term in the potential biologicalproduct reference. The method additionally includes calculating a totalscore for the candidate text phrase based on relative tag scoresassociated with each vocabulary tag for the one or more terms. Therelative tag scores represent a relative confidence strength of eachvocabulary tag in the potential biological product reference. The methodalso includes classifying the candidate text phrase as a biologicalproduct reference based on the total score exceeding a threshold.Additionally, the method includes searching a database for one or moreproduct entries based on the biological product references with theseone or more product entries then retrieved from the database forpotential use in providing one or more product recommendations for thebiological product reference.

INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

All publications, patents, and patent applications mentioned in thisspecification are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent asif each individual publication, patent, or patent application wasspecifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present disclosure can be understood from the following detaileddescription, either alone or together with the accompanying drawings.The drawings are included to provide a further understanding of thepresent disclosure, and are incorporated in and constitute a part ofthis specification. The drawings illustrate one or more exemplaryembodiments of the present teachings and together with the descriptionserve to explain certain principles and operation.

FIG. 1 depicts a schematic illustration of a network environment,according to various exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 2 depicts a block system diagram of a search environment, accordingto various exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 3 depicts a workflow of a method for identifying references in adocument, according to various exemplary embodiment of the presentdisclosure.

FIG. 4 depicts a workflow of a method for processing text of a documentto identify references in a document, according to various exemplaryembodiments of the present disclosure.

FIGS. 5A-5D depict interfaces for displaying product recommendations,according to various exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 6 depicts block diagram of a computer system, according to variousexemplary embodiments of the present disclosure.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EXEMPLARY EMBODIMENTS

The present disclosure concerns a new and novel process and system foridentifying biological product references, e.g., antibody productreferences, in electronic documents, such as, for example, scientificpapers, journal or trade articles, and other documents containing suchproduct references. Based on the identified references, the process andsystem provide targeted product recommendations corresponding to theidentified biological product references. In various exemplaryembodiments, a search engine performs customized natural languageprocessing to identify biological product references regardless of theformat and terminology used in the input search criteria.

The natural language processing includes customized part-of-speechidentification that addresses misidentified parts-of-speech that arespecific to the technical field of the biological products. For example,the natural language processor identifies relevant characters in acandidate biological product reference misidentified as stopwords orstandard text symbols, field specific terms in a candidate biologicalproduct reference misidentified as nouns/adjectives, and/or relevantconjunctions in a candidate biological product reference misidentifiedas standard language conjunctions. Additionally, the natural languageprocessor includes customized sentence processing that considersmisidentified sentence structure. For example, the natural languageprocessor identifies noun phrases misidentified due to parentheses orother symbols and/or multiple biological product references mis-groupedin a phrase or fragment.

The search engine also includes customized vocabulary tagging tailoredto the technical field of the biological product. For example, thesearch engine tags terms according to a technical meaning relative tothe biological product reference. The search engine also includescustomized confidence scoring for a candidate biological productreference. For example, each term in a phrase is given a score based onassociated vocabulary tags. Likewise, scores for each tag customized forthe technical field of the biological product and scores for each tagindicates relative confidence strength in a given phrase. The searchengine identifies candidate biological product reference as a biologicalproduct reference if the confidence score exceeds a threshold.

For identified biological product references, biological productrecommendations are determined and presented to the user for possiblepurchase. For example, the identified biological product references inthe electronic document can be replaced or supplemented with a link thatpresents details on the product recommendation and a redirect to and/orother information to facilitate purchase the product.

FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of a network environment 100,according to various exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure.While the network environment 100 illustrates various components, oneskilled in the art would realize that additional components can be addedand/or existing components can be removed.

As illustrated in FIG. 1, the network environment 100 includes acomputer device 102 and one or more server computers 104 communicatingvia a network 106. The server computers 104 are coupled to one or moredatabases 108. In embodiments, a document 110 may be provided at thecomputer device 102. For example, the document 110 can be madeaccessible at the computer device 102 for viewing, accessing, editing,scanning, etc. For various reasons, it may be desirable to identifyreferences that are contained in the document 110. For example, thedocument 110 can be a scientific paper in a technical field, such asbiology, and a user accessing the document 110 at computer device 102may desire to identify various scientific references in the document 110and potential products associated with the references. For instance, theuser may be viewing a document 110 that concerns reference antibodies,and the user may desire to identify the antibody references in thedocument 110 and products associated with the antibody references. Theuser, however, may not be able to easily identify the references. Forexample, in the scientific field, differing documents, such as differingdocuments 110, often use different terminology in describing the same orvery similar biological product references, such as antibody referencesfor example. As such, it may be difficult for a user or other recipientof the information in the document to properly identify the referenceseither manually or automatically.

In various exemplary embodiments, the network environment 100 canprovide a process for automatically identifying references in thedocument 110. As described further below, the network environment 100provides a search environment in which the references in the document110 can be automatically identified regardless of the terminology usedin the document 110. In the search environment, the text 112 on thedocument 110 can be extracted and transmitted to the server computers104 of the network environment 100. Once received, the server computers104 can parse the text 112 to identify the references contained in thetext 112. Once identified, the server computers 104 can search thedatabases 108 for products associated with the references and providedetails of those products at the computer device 102, for example to beaccessed by a user contemporaneously or at a later date. The servercomputers 104 can transmit one or more product recommendations 114 tothe computer device 102.

The computer device 102 can be any type of computing device foraccessing and viewing the document 110. For example, the computer device102 can include one or more server computers, one or more desktopcomputers, one or more laptop computer, one or more tablet computers,one or more mobile devices, and the like. In any example, the computerdevice 102 can include hardware resources (processors, memory, storage,etc.) and software resources (operating systems, application programs,etc.) to perform the processes and methods described herein.

The server computers 104 can be any type of computing device or systemcapable of performing the processes and methods described herein. Insome embodiments, the server computers 104 can be physical computersystems. In this example, the server computers 104 can include hardwareresources (processors, memory, storage, etc.) and software resources(operating systems, application programs, etc.) to perform the processesand methods described herein. In some embodiments, the server computers104 can be implemented in virtual computer systems. In this example, thefunctionality of the server computer 104 and the databases 108 can beimplemented in one or more cloud computer systems. The network 120 canbe any type of network whether public or private.

FIG. 2 illustrates a block diagram of a search environment 200,according to various embodiments of the present disclosure. While thesearch environment 200 illustrates various components, one skilled inthe art will realize that additional components can be added and/orexisting components can be removed.

As illustrated in FIG. 2, the search environment 200 includes a userapplication 202 with an application module 204. The user application 202can be any type of user application that accesses, edits and displays adocument, such as document 110 from FIG. 1. For example, the userapplication 202 can include a web browser, a document editor, an imageviewer, and the like. The application module 204 can be configured tointerface with the user application and perform the processes describedherein. For example, the application module 204 can be a module thatintegrates with the user application 202, e.g., a browser extension. Theapplication module 204 can be written in or utilize a variety ofprogramming languages, for example, JAVA, C++, Python code, VisualBasic, hypertext markup language (HTML), extensible markup language(XML), and the like to accommodate a variety of operating systems,computing system architectures, etc.

The application module 204 provides a user interface 206 for initiatingthe identification of potential references in the document 110.Additionally, the user interface 206 provides a display for outputtingthe results of the identification. The user interface 206 can be anytype of command line and/or graphical user interface (GUI) that allowsthe user to interact with the application module 204 and the application202. The application module 204 can be configured to provide, via theuser interface 206, controls, forms, reports, etc., to allow the user ofthe application 202 to interact with the application module 204 andperform the processes described herein.

The application module 204 communicates with a search engine 208 coupledto a database 210. The application module 204 can be configured toextract the text of a document, such as text 112 of the document 110described with reference to FIG. 1. Once extracted, the applicationmodule 204 can transmit the text of the document 110 to the searchengine 208. The search engine 208 can be written in or utilize a varietyof programming languages, such as JAVA, C++, Python code, Visual Basic,hypertext markup language (HTML), extensible markup language (XML), andthe like to accommodate a variety of operating systems, computing systemarchitectures, etc.

The search engine 208 includes a text processor 212. The text processor212 can be configured to process the text of a document (e.g., thedocument 110). For example, the text processor 212 can be configured toparse the text of a document into syntactic structure of the text. Inembodiments, the text processor 212 can be configured to utilize acustomized natural language processor (NLP) that is tailored to theterminology and syntax of the technical field of the document 110. Toproperly parse the text into syntactic structures, the text processor212 can utilize custom syntax data 214 to properly identify thesyntactic structure of references by addressing the specific syntax ofthe technical field of the document 110. The custom syntax data 214 caninclude a syntactic role of one or more terms relative to a technicalfield associated with the potential biological product reference.

Once the candidate text phrases are parsed in the syntactic structures,the text processor 212 can tag the terms in the syntactic structures andscore the syntactic structure based on the tags. To tag and score thesyntactic structures, the text processor 212 can utilize term scoringdictionary 216. The text processor 212 can compare each of the terms inthe syntactic structure to the term scoring dictionary 216 to locate atag and assign the tag to each of the terms based on the comparison. Theterm scoring data dictionary 216 can include different vocabulary termsthat are found in the references for the technical field and a relativeconfidence score for the tags. The term scoring dictionary 216 caninclude several lists or categories that are generated from multipledictionaries and sources for the identifying and classifying terms thatare relevant to the technical field of the document. For example, in thebiological field, the term scoring dictionary 216 can include the listsgenerated from multiple dictionaries and sources in the biologicalfield.

Once the references in the text of the document are identified, the textprocessor 212 transmits the references to a database (DB) interface 218.The DB interface 218 can be configured to generate one or more queriesto search the database 210 based on the references identified in thetext of the document. The DB interface 218 can search the database 210using the queries to search the database 210 for products that areassociated with the references. Once products are identified, the DBinterface 218 can extract details of the identified products from thedatabase 210.

Once products are identified and details extracted, the search engine208 can return the results to the application module 204. Theapplication module 204 can be configured to generate an interface fordisplaying the results to the user of the application 202. For example,the application module 204 can modify the text of the document 110 toreplace or supplement the references in the document 110 with a link tothe details of the product extracted from the database 210. As such, auser of the application 202 can identify the references and obtain thedetails of the product from the text of the document.

FIG. 3 depicts an exemplary parts of a workflow for a method for 300 fordetermining field specific terms and recommendations, according toembodiments of the present disclosure. Although FIG. 3 depicts stepsperformed in a particular order for purposes of illustration anddiscussion, the operations discussed herein are not limited to anyparticular order or arrangement. One skilled in the art, using thedisclosures provided herein, would appreciate that various steps of themethods can be omitted, rearranged, combined, and/or adapted in variousways.

After the method 300 begins, in 302, the text of a document of interestcan be determined. For example, referring to the example in FIG. 1, adocument 110 can be provided at the computer device 102 for viewing,editing, or otherwise accessing, and the document can contain relevantreferences of which the identify is sought.

For example, referring to the example in FIG. 2, a search is initiatedvia the user interface 206. For example, references, such as biologicalreferences, in the document 110 may be desired to be extracted andrelated product recommendations identified. In response, the applicationmodule 204 can access the document 110 and extract the text from thedocument 110. Once extracted, the application module 204 can transmitthe text to the search engine 208.

In 304, the relevant references can be determined from the text of thedocument. In embodiments, the text processor 212 can utilize acustomized natural language processor (NLP) that is tailored to theterminology and syntax of the technical field of the document 110. Toproperly parse the text into syntactic structures, the text processor212 can utilize custom syntax data 214 to properly identify thesyntactic structure of references by addressing the specific syntax ofthe technical field of the document 110. The custom syntax data 214 caninclude a syntactic role of one or more terms relative to a technicalfield associated with the potential biological product reference.

After the candidate text phrases are parsed in the syntactic structures,the text processor 212 can tag the terms in the syntactic structures andscore the syntactic structure based on the tags. To tag and score thesyntactic structures, the text processor 212 can utilize term scoringdictionary 216. The term scoring data dictionary 216 can includedifferent vocabulary terms that are found in the references for thetechnical field and a relative confidence score for the tags.

At 306, a database can be queried for recommendation related to therelevant references. In the exemplary embodiment of FIG. 2, the textprocessor 212 transmits the references to the DB interface 218. The DBinterface 218 can be configured to generate one or more queries tosearch the database 210 based on the references identified in the textof the document. The DB interface 218 can search the database 210 usingthe queries to search the database 210 for products that are associatedwith the references. Once products are identified, the DB interface 218can extract details of the identified products from the database 210.

At 308, the recommendations can be output with the relevant referencesin the documents. With reference to FIG. 2, the application module 204can generate an interface for displaying the results to the user of theapplication 202. For example, the application module 204 can modify thetext of the document 110 to replace or supplement the references in thedocument 110 with a link to the details of the product extracted fromthe database 210. As such, the application 202 can be used to identifythe references and obtain the details of the product from the text ofthe document.

FIG. 4 depicts a workflow of a method 400 for determining references intext from a document, according to various exemplary embodiments of thepresent disclosure. Although FIG. 4 depicts steps in a particular orderfor purposes of illustration and discussion, the operations discussedherein are not limited to any particular order or arrangement. Oneskilled in the art, using the disclosures provided herein, wouldappreciate that various steps of the methods can be omitted, rearranged,combined, and/or adapted in various ways.

After text from a document is received, in 402, pre-processing isperformed on the text of the document. For example, the search engine208 can receive the text 112 of the document 110 from application module204. The text processor 212 can perform pre-processing on the text toenhance parsing and the identification of candidate text phrases.

For example, if the document 110 is a web page, the text processor 212can identify text blocks that end in a “newline” as text phrases.Likewise, for example, the text processor 212 can assume the text blockswere separate HTML elements on the web page and separate the text blocksas different sentences so the NLP parsing does not combine possiblesentences. Also, for example, the text processor 212 can obfuscatevarious abbreviations (such as “Cat. #” and “et al.”) so that the NLPparsing does not consider the abbreviations to be the ends of sentences.In other example, the test processor 212 can perform pre-processing onother types of documents such as portable document format (“.pdf”) toenhance parsing and the identification of candidate text phrases.

In 404, candidate text phrases can be determined from the text of thedocument. In embodiment, the text processor 212 can utilize a customizedNLP to determine the candidate text phrases. The NLP can utilize a setof syntax models for sentence detection, parts-of-speech identification,and/or phrase chunking.

For example, using the set of syntax models, the text processor 212 canbreak down the entire text content into individual sentences. Then, thetext processor 212 can break down each sentence into individualwords/punctuation/etc. Once broken down, the text processor 212 canidentify the part-of-speech (PoS), e.g., noun, verb, etc. for each termin the sentence.

At 406, a candidate text phrase can be selected. Once selected, in 408,the candidate text phrase can be parsed into a syntactic structure. Forexample, the text processor 212 can create a syntactic structure, e.g.,“sentence tree,” based on the structure of the sentence determined bythe ordering of the identified parts-of-speech.

In certain embodiments, the NLP utilized by the text processor 212 canbe customized to identify words that may have been misidentified by thePoS identification. For example, using the custom syntax data 214, theNLP can be tailored for the technical field related to the relevantreferences being identified. Once identified, the text processor 212 canassign a corrected identification to the misidentified words accordingto the correct PoS in the technical filed, i.e., the technical syntacticrole. For instance, if the text processor 212 is identifying candidatebiological references, e.g., antibodies, the NLP can be customized tolook for terms that potentially could be misidentified by the NLPbecause the terms have specific meaning the biological field. Forexample, using the custom syntax data 214, the text processor 212 canidentify terms such as symbols like # and % tagged as anything except a“SYMBOL” PoS, words that match known protein/gene names that are nottagged as a NOUN PoS, protein/antibody conjugation words that are nottagged as ADJECTIVE part-of-speech, conjunctions (‘and’ or ‘or’) notproperly tagged as CONJUNCTION part-of-speech, and the like. Byconsidering PoS specific to the technical field, the text processor canyield clean phrases for subsequent steps in the process.

At 409, fragment filtering is performed on the syntactic structure. Invarious exemplary embodiments, with reference to FIG. 2, the textprocessor 212 filters the syntactic structure according to a syntacticrole of the one or more terms relative to a technical field associatedwith the potential references, for instance, the biological field or amore specialized subset thereof.

For example, after the NLP framework has created a syntactic structure,the text processor 212 can perform additional custom processing tocollect the sentence phrases/fragments that are likely being treated asthe subject or object of the sentence. In the processing, the textprocessor 212 can look for groups of words that the NLP has identifiedas “noun phrases,” attach parenthesis phrases/fragments to the nearestnoun phrase, and check for phrases/fragments that might contain multipleproduct references and defragment them.

For instance, the text processor 212, using the NLP, can select anexample sentence “Primary antisera were as follows: BrdU (ab6326,Abcam), Ki67 (RM-9106-s1, Thermo Scientific), p-Histone-3 (06-570,Millipore) . . . ” and break it down into the following syntacticstructure based on the PoS identified in the previous steps:

1. Primary_ADJECTIVE antisera_NOUN2. were_VERB as_PREPOSITION3. follows_VERB

4. :_COLON

5. BrdU_NOUN (_PAREN ab6326_NOUN,_COMMA Abcam_NOUN)_PAREN,_COMMAKi67_NOUN (_PAREN RM-9106-s1_NOUN,_COMMA Thermo_NOUNScientific_NOUN)_PAREN

6. ,_COMMA

7. p-Histone-3_NOUN (_PAREN 06-570_NUMBER8. ,_COMMA Millipore_NOUN)_PAREN

In this example, grouping 5 combined two valuable phrases across a commathat each contain an antibody reference. Highlighting the entire phrasewould be incorrect. Moreover, it would be difficult to determine whatantibody is being referenced when the entire phrase contains differentprotein/gene references. In grouping 7 and 8, a parenthesis grouping mayhave been broken out into two phrases due to the comma within theparenthesis. The contents within the parenthesis should be kept togetherwithin a phrase, and without that full information each separate phrasewould not have enough information to correctly identify the antibody.

In this example, the text processor 212 filters the syntactic structureaccording to a syntactic role of the one or more terms relative to atechnical field (e.g., the biological field or a more specialized subsetthereof) associated with the potential antibody reference Afterfiltering to detect and correct these incorrect phrase groupings, thetext processor 212 can generate a syntactic structure:

1. Primary_ADJECTIVE antisera_NOUN2. were_VERB as_PREPOSITION3. follows_VERB

4. :_COLON

5. BrdU_NOUN (_PAREN ab6326_NOUN,_COMMA Abcam_NOUN)_PAREN

6. ,_COMMA

7. Ki67_NOUN (_PAREN RM-9106-s1_NOUN,_COMMA Thermo_NOUNScientific_NOUN)_PAREN

8. ,_COMMA

9. p-Histone-3_NOUN (_PAREN 06-570_NUMBER,_COMMA Millipore_NOUN)_PAREN

At 410, it can be determined if the syntactic structure indicates apotential reference. In exemplary embodiments, the text processor 212can examine the syntactic structure and determine if any of the termscould indicate a potential reference. For example, the text processor212 can determine if the syntactic structure contains any terms thatrelate to the technical field, e.g., antibody reference. If thesyntactic structure indicates a potential reference, in 412, the termsin the syntactic structure can be tagged. In embodiments, after thesyntactic structure is determined to be a potential reference, the textprocessor 212 can scan the syntactic structure to determine if itcontains terms that are part of a known “vocabulary” for the technicalfield and can tag the terms. The syntactic structure can be scanned foreach vocabulary before scanning for the next vocabulary is performed.

For example, in the biological field example, referring again to FIG. 2,the text processor 212 can scan the syntactic structure based on theterm scoring dictionary 216. The term scoring dictionary 216 can includea one or more hierarchical lists of vocabulary terms that are commonlyfound in references in the biological field, e.g., antibody terms. Oneexample of a sequence in which the tagging processing occurs (some tagsindicate that no other tag should be assigned to the same term) is asfollows:

1. Clonality tagging2. Host species tagging3. Target species tagging4. Company name tagging5. Location tagging6. Protein/gene/protein family tagging7. Conjugation taggingOnly if steps 3, 4, or 6 identify a term in the fragment the followingadditional tagging is done8. Clone ID tagging9. Catalog Number tagging10. Modification tagging11. Isotype tagging

Based on the example discussed above, the text processor 212 can tag thesyntactic structure with additional tags (on top of the previous PoSidentification) to the terms found in the term scoring dictionary 216(shown in BOLD below).

1. Primary_ADJECTIVE:PRECEDENCE antisera_NOUN:ANTIBODY_INDICATORwere_VERB as_PREPOSITION2. follows_VERB

3. :_COLON

4. BrdU_NOUN:NON_PROTEIN_TARGET (_PARENab6326_NOUN:CATALOG_NUMBER,_COMMA Abcam_NOUN:COMPANY_NAME)_PAREN

5. ,_COMMA

6. Ki67_NOUN:PROTEIN (_PAREN RM-9106-s1_NOUN:CATALOG_NUMBER,_COMMA7. Thermo_NOUN:COMPANY_NAME Scientific_NOUN:COMPANY_NAME)_PAREN

8. ,_COMMA

9. p-Histone-3_NOUN:PROTEIN_FAMILY (_PAREN06-570_NUMBER:CATALOG_NUMBER,_COMMA Millipore_NOUN:COMPANY_NAME)_PAREN

In various exemplary embodiments, the term scoring dictionary 216 caninclude several lists or categories that are generated from multipledictionaries and sources for the identifying and classifying terms thatare relevant to the technical field of the document. For example, in thebiological field, the term scoring dictionary 216 can include the listsgenerated from multiple dictionaries and sources described below. Thetext processor 212 can compare each of the terms in the syntacticstructure to the term scoring dictionary 216 to locate a tag and assignthe tag to each of the terms based on the comparison.

Clonality Tagging

The term scoring dictionary 216 can include a hard-coded list ofclonality terms (like ‘monoclonal’, ‘mab’, ‘polyclonal’, etc.). At 412,the text processor 212 can check each fragment term to determine whetherit matches.

Host Species Tagging

The term scoring dictionary 216 can include different species found inantibody references. For example, the term scoring dictionary 216 can begenerated using a product database, e.g., Thermo Fisher™ productdatabase to include a set of possible Host (mouse, goat, etc.) terms. In412, the text processor 212 can check each term from the fragmentagainst the list.

Target Species Tagging

The term scoring dictionary 216 can include of different target speciesfound in antibody references. For example, the term scoring dictionary216 can be generated using a product database, e.g., Thermo Fisher™product database to include, a set of possible Target (anti-mouse,anti-goat, etc.) terms. In 412, the text processor 212 can check eachterm from the fragment against the list.

Company Name Tagging

The term scoring dictionary 216 can include of different company namesfound in antibody references. For example, the term scoring dictionary216 can be generated using an AntibodyRegistry data source, which is aunique list of vendors from across all antibody product entries(currently ˜4.1 k vendor names). An additional list of ˜200 manuallycurated common company synonyms can also be used to augment the set fromAntibodyRegistry.

In 412, the text processor 212 can check each fragment for every knownvendor name and synonym. Every word in the fragment that is part of amatching vendor name is tagged as being a company name vocabulary.

Protein/Gene/Protein Family Tagging

The term scoring dictionary 216 can include of differentprotein/gene/family names found in antibody references. For example, theterm scoring dictionary 216 can be generated using the Uniprot datasource. At 412, the text processor 212 can check each term in thefragment against the dictionary of “protein short name”, “gene name” and“protein family” terms. In embodiments, the text processor 212 canutilize additional logic to avoid improperly tagging terms beforechecking the dictionary of “protein short name”, “gene name” and“protein family” terms:

1. Ignores single character words.

2. Ignores all numeric words

3. Ignores a list of ‘stopwords’ like ‘and’, ‘or’, ‘the’, etc.

4. Ignores common month abbreviations (exact match)—‘Jan’, ‘Feb’, etc.

5. Strips common “anti-” prefix.

6. Strips known Modification and Isotype prefixes such as ‘phospo-’ and‘gamma’

7. Checks for the full phrase, as well as removing a trailing “0.1” or“−2” modifier in case like “PARM-1” or “PDX.1” would also check for“PARM1” or “PDX1”.

Clone ID Tagging

The term scoring dictionary 216 can include different clone IDs found inantibody references. For example, the term scoring dictionary 216 can begenerated using the AntibodyRegistry data source to obtain a unique listof clone IDs from across all antibody product entries (currently ˜40 kvalues). At 412, the text processor 212 can check various regularexpression patterns to attempt to identify the Clone ID based on the“Antibody Product Name” field from the data source. However, there maybe inconsistent product naming conventions across the variousbiotechnology supply vendor. This may result in a number of “invalid”Clone ID being identified from the AntibodyRegistry data.

Catalog Number Tagging

The term scoring dictionary 216 can include of different catalog numbersfound in antibody references. For example, the term scoring dictionary216 can be generated using the AntibodyRegistry data source. In 412, thetext processor 212 can check each term in the fragment in the SOLRindex. The following additional logic is implemented before checking thedata source:

1. Ignores single character words

2. Ignores a list of ‘stopwords’ like ‘and’, ‘or’, ‘the’, etc.

3. Removes leading catalog identifiers like ‘Cat’ and ‘#’.

4. Creates variations of the term to check

-   -   a. Exact term and without “-” characters    -   b. Upper Case and Lower Case

The relevancy score from SOLR is checked for a set threshold before theterm is considered a match.

Modification and Modification Type Tagging

The term scoring dictionary 216 can include different modification andmodification types found in antibody references. For example, the termscoring dictionary 216 can be generated using a product database, e.g.,the ThermoFisher™ product database, to obtain a set of modifications andmodification types (˜1300 modifications, ˜5 modification types). In 412,the text processor 212 can check each term from the fragment is checkedagainst the Modification Type and Modification values.

The following additional logic is implemented before checking the datasource: the word is split into parts using any of the followingcharacters

Isotype Tagging

The term scoring dictionary 216 can include different isotypes found inantibody references. For example, the term scoring dictionary 216 can begenerated using a hard-coded list of isotype terms. At 412, the textprocessor 212 can check each fragment term to determine whether containsthe isotype term.

The list of isotype terms (check codebase for exact list) are:

α, α1, α2, δ, ε, γ, γ1, γ2, γ3, γ4, μ, κ, λ

iga, iga1, iga2, igd, ige, igg, igg1, igg2, igg2a, igg2a1, igg2b, igg2c,igg3, igg4, igm, kappa, lambda

Conjugation Tagging

The term scoring dictionary 216 can include different modification andmodification types found in antibody references. For example, the termscoring dictionary 216 can be generated using a product database, e.g.,the ThermoFisher™ product database, to obtain a set of conjugations(˜100). At 412, the text processor 212 can check each term from thefragment against the list of Conjugation values.

At 414, a score for the candidate text phrase can be calculated, and at416, the candidate text phrase can be classified as a reference based onthe calculated score. In various exemplary embodiments, the textprocessor 212 can utilize the term scoring dictionary 216 to score eachterm in the syntactic structure based on a relative score for each tag.Based on the types of vocabularies identified on terms in a syntacticstructure text processor 212 creates an overall weighted score for thecandidate text phrase of the syntactic structure.

For example, the weights, in the term scoring dictionary 216, assignedto the presence of each vocabulary term can be determined throughvarious discussions with subject matter experts. The magnitudes of thescores/weights are determined relative to each other indicate thestrength of the presence of those vocabularies as indicators/featuresfor determining if the phrase being evaluated is referencing an antibodyproduct used in the article. The text processor 212 can consider onlyphrases scoring over a specific threshold as ‘phrase matches’ thatshould be highlighted/identified by the application module 204. Thespecific threshold value used by the text processor 212 can bedetermined through a manual evaluation of scores for various phraseswithin the test suite of research articles and set to a level thatoptimized the accuracy of reference identification while minimizingincorrect phrase identification (if too low of a threshold was used).

For example, for the example described above, the text processor 212 canstore the tagged terms of the syntactic structure using the followingscoring system:

ANTIBODY_INDICATOR_SCORE=5 (Anywhere in sentence, not just phrase)PRECENDENCE_SCORE=5 (Anywhere in sentence, not just phrase)PROTEIN_GENE_TAG_SCORE=15;MODIFICATION_TAG_SCORE=10;ISOTYPE_TAG_SCORE=10;CATALOG_NUMBER_TAG_SCORE=10;CLONE_ID_TAG_SCORE=10;CONJUGATION_TAG_SCORE=10;CLONALITY_TAG_SCORE=10;COMPANY_TAG_SCORE=10;HOST_TAG_SCORE=10;TARGET_SPECIES_TAG_SCORE=10;MODIFICATION_TYPE_TAG_SCORE=5;

Then, the text processor 212 can calculate a sum of relative scores foreach vocabulary found in candidate text phrase and calculate a totalscore by dividing the sum of the scores by a total possible score. Forexample, the text processor 212 can identify Isotype and Host vocabularyfound in candidate text phrase that has Points for the phrase=20 anddetermine the Score=20 out of 100=0.20. The text processor 212 can checkagainst a score threshold before considering the phrase a match. Forexample, if the threshold is 0.30, the previous example would not beconsidered a confident phrase match.

Using the example, the text processor 212 can determine a score asfollows:

1. (Score 10/100=0.10) Primary_PRECENDENCE:5antisera_ANTIBODY_INDICATOR:2. (Score 0/100=0.0) were as3. (Score 0/100=0.0) follows

4. (Score 0/100=0.0):

5. (Score 45/100=0.45) BrdU_NON_PROTEIN_TARGET:15(ab6326_CATALOG_NUMBER:10, Abcam_COMPANY_NAME:10)

6. (Score 0/100=0.0),

7. (Score 45/100=0.45) Ki67_PROTEIN:15 (RM-9106-s1_CATALOG_NUMBER:10,8. Thermo_COMPANY_NAME:10 Scientific_COMPANY_NAME:10) (Score 0/100=0.0),9. (Score 45/100=0.45) p-Histone-3_PROTEIN_FAMILY:15(06-570_CATALOG_NUMBER:10, Millipore_COMPANY_NAME:10)

Phrases 5, 7, and 9 have scores higher than the threshold of 0.30,resulting in them being highlighted by the tool.

At 418, it can be determined whether any additional candidate textphrases are available from the text. If additional candidate textphrases are available, method 400 can return to 406 and process theadditional candidate text phrase. Otherwise, the method 400 can end.

Various aspects of the inventive method of using the novel naturallanguage processing approaches and embodiments described hereincontribute to the improved accuracy of the identified products in thedocument of interest and the relevancy of the subsequently recommendedproducts as compared to conventional methods. These aspects of thenatural language processing approach for candidate text phrases in thedocument of interest include but are not limited to: (1) utilizingcustom syntax data to improve the proper identification of the syntacticstructure of references by addressing the specific syntax of therelevant technical field for the document, (2) utilizing a term scoringdictionary to tag the syntactic structures, including the use ofmultiple dictionaries and other sources, for the improved identificationand classification of terms that are relevant to the technical field forthe document, (3) calculating a score for tagged terms based on ascoring system and use of a term scoring dictionary that assignsdifferent weights to different types of vocabulary terms and thepresence of those vocabulary terms in the candidate text phrase toimprove the accuracy of identified products while also reducing thefrequency of incorrect identifications through use of an appropriatescore threshold against the sum output of the scoring system and theterm scoring dictionary.

Various aspects of the novel natural language processing approaches andembodiments described herein are independent on a large amount oftraining runs or a large amount of training data and can therefore beimplemented using only limited requirements on processing power andstorage capacity. In one aspect, the novel natural language processingapproaches described herein help improve the accuracy of the identifiedproducts as compared to conventional methods.

The improved accuracy of the novel natural language processingapproaches and embodiments described herein may be expressed in terms ofan improved accuracy in relation to a demand on a computer resource. Inthis regard an improved accuracy of the novel natural languageprocessing approaches and embodiments described herein may be expressedor may become apparent as an improved accuracy, given a certain demandon a computer resource. On the other hand the improved accuracy may beexpressed or may become apparent as a reduced demand on a computerresource required to achieve the same or similar accuracy.

As discussed above, once the references have been identified in adocument and product recommendations determined, the productrecommendations can be provided and/or stored at the computer device102. FIGS. 5A-5D illustrate examples of the presentation of the productreferences. As illustrated in FIG. 5A, a user may access and view anelectronic document using an application program 500. For example, theapplication program 500 can be a web browser. The user can navigate to awebsite 502 to view and access an electronic document 504, for example,a journal article. The electronic document 504 can include text 506 thatis related to a technical field, for example, biology. For instance, theuser may be viewing a scientific paper that concerns referenceantibodies, and the user may desire to identify the antibody referencesin the document and products associated with the antibody references.

In embodiment, the application program 500 can include the applicationmodule 204 that generates an interface 508 for identifying referenceswithin the electronic document 504. As discussed above, a search can beinitiated via the interface 508. For example, references, such asbiological references, in the text 506 in the document 504 may bedesired to be extracted and related product recommendations identified.In response, the application module 204 can access the document 504 andextract the text 506 from the document 504. Once extracted, theapplication module 204 can transmit the text to the search engine 208.As illustrated, the interface 508 can display a status 510 of theprocess of extracting the text 506 and processing the text 506 forsearching.

As illustrated in FIG. 5B, as the potential references are identified inthe document 504, the application module 204 can annotate the potentialreferences in the text 506 of the document 504. For example, theapplication module 204 can annotate the potential references, e.g.,potential antibody references, with highlighting 512. In embodiments,the application module 204 can communicate with the search engine 208during the method 400 described above in FIG. 4 to identify thepotential references.

As illustrated in FIG. 5C, once the search engine 208 has identified thereferences and searched the database 210 for related products, forexample using the method 400 described above, the product references canbe returned to the application module 204. The application module 204can generate and display a list 514 of the product references in theinterface 508. For example, the list 514 can include an ordered andnumbered list of the product references. In embodiments, each entry inthe list 514 can include a description of the product reference, a linkto the product, and other information associated with the product. Theapplication module 204 can also further annotate the text 506 of thedocument 504 with a link 516 to the list 514. The link 516 can directlyassociate the product with the reference in the text 506.

As illustrated in FIG. 5D, the list 514 can include an active link 518to information on the product. If the active link 518 is selected by theuser, the application module 204 can invoke an application to view thedetails of the product. For example, the active link 518 can be a linkto a website associated with the product. For instance, when the activelink 518 is selected, the application module 204 can invoke theapplication 520, e.g., a new web browser or window in a web browser,that navigates to a web page associated with the product. As such, theuser can view details of the product and potentially purchase theproduct.

In one or more exemplary embodiments, the functions described can beimplemented in hardware, software, firmware, or any combination thereof.For a software implementation, the techniques described herein can beimplemented with modules (e.g., procedures, functions, subprograms,programs, routines, subroutines, modules, software packages, classes,and so on) that perform the functions described herein. A module can becoupled to another module or a hardware circuit by passing and/orreceiving information, data, arguments, parameters, or memory contents.Information, arguments, parameters, data, or the like can be passed,forwarded, or transmitted using any suitable means including memorysharing, message passing, token passing, network transmission, and thelike. The software codes can be stored in memory units and executed byprocessors. The memory unit can be implemented within the processor orexternal to the processor, in which case it can be communicativelycoupled to the processor via various means as is known in the art.

For example, FIG. 6 illustrates an example of a hardware configurationfor a computer device 600, for example, the computer device 102, theserver computers 104, or other computer systems. While FIG. 6illustrates various components contained in the computer device 600,FIG. 6 illustrates one example of a computer device and additionalcomponents can be added and existing components can be removed.

The computer device 600 can be any type of computer device. Asillustrated in FIG. 6, the computer device 600 can include one or moreprocessors 602 of varying core configurations and clock frequencies. Thecomputer device 600 can also include one or more memory devices 604 thatserve as a main memory during the operation of the computer device 600.For example, during operation, a copy of the one or more softwareprograms 605 that supports the processes and methods described above canbe stored in the one or more memory devices 604. The computer device 600can also include one or more peripheral interfaces 606, such askeyboards, mice, touchpads, computer screens, touchscreens, etc., forenabling human interaction with and manipulation of the computer device600.

The computer device 600 can also include one or more network interfaces608 for communicating via one or more networks, for example the network106, such as Ethernet adapters, wireless transceivers, or serial networkcomponents, for communicating over wired or wireless media usingprotocols. The computer device 600 can also include one or more storagedevice 610 of varying physical dimensions and storage capacities, suchas flash drives, hard drives, random access memory, etc., for storingdata, such as images, files, and program instructions for execution bythe one or more processors 602.

Additionally, the computer device 600 can include the one or moresoftware programs 605 that enable the functionality of the processes andmethods described above. The one or more software programs 605 caninclude instructions that cause the one or more processors 602 toperform the processes described herein. Copies of the one or moresoftware programs 605 can be stored in the one or more memory devices604 and/or on in the one or more storage devices 610. Likewise, the datautilized by one or more software programs 605 can be stored in the oneor more memory devices 604 and/or on in the one or more storage devices610.

The computer device 600 can include a variety of data stores and othermemory and storage media as discussed above. These can reside in avariety of locations, such as on a storage medium local to (and/orresident in) one or more of the computers or remote from any or all ofthe computers across the network. In some implementations, informationcan reside in a storage-area network (SAN) familiar to those skilled inthe art. Similarly, any necessary files for performing the functionsattributed to the computers, servers, or other network devices may bestored locally and/or remotely, as appropriate.

In implementations, the components of the computer device 600 asdescribed above need not be enclosed within a single enclosure or evenlocated in close proximity to one another. Those skilled in the art willappreciate that the above-described componentry are examples only, asthe computer device 600 can include any type of hardware componentry,including any necessary accompanying firmware or software, forperforming the disclosed implementations. The computer device 600 canalso be implemented in part or in whole by electronic circuit componentsor processors, such as application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs)or field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs).

The examples of systems and methods described herein can be performedunder the control of a processing system executing computer-readablecodes embodied on a computer-readable recording medium or communicationsignals transmitted through a transitory medium. The computer-readablerecording medium is any data storage device that can store data readableby a processing system, and includes both volatile and nonvolatilemedia, removable and non-removable media, and contemplates mediareadable by a database, a computer, and various other network devices.

Examples of the computer-readable recording medium include, but are notlimited to, read-only memory (ROM), random-access memory (RAM), erasableelectrically programmable ROM (EEPROM), flash memory or other memorytechnology, holographic media or other optical disc storage, magneticstorage including magnetic tape and magnetic disk, and solid statestorage devices. The computer-readable recording medium can also bedistributed over network-coupled computer systems so that thecomputer-readable code is stored and executed in a distributed fashion.The communication signals transmitted through a transitory medium caninclude, for example, modulated signals transmitted through wired orwireless transmission paths.

While the present disclosure contains reference to exemplary embodimentsthereof, those skilled in the art would be able to make variousmodifications to the described embodiments without departing from thescope and principles of operation. The terms and descriptions usedherein are set forth by way of illustration only and are not meant aslimitations. In particular, although the processes have been describedby examples, the stages of the processes can be performed in a differentorder than illustrated or simultaneously. Furthermore, to the extentthat the terms “including”, “includes”, “having”, “has”, “with”, orvariants thereof are used in the detailed description, such terms areintended to be inclusive in a manner similar to the term “comprising.”As used herein, the terms “one or more of” and “at least one of” withrespect to a listing of items such as, for example, A and B, means Aalone, B alone, or A and B. Further, unless specified otherwise, theterm “set” should be interpreted as “one or more.” Also, the term“couple” or “couples” is intended to mean either an indirect or directconnection. Thus, if a first device couples to a second device, thatconnection can be through a direct connection, or through an indirectconnection via other devices, components, and connections.

While exemplary embodiments have been shown and described herein, itwill be obvious to those skilled in the art that such embodiments areprovided by way of example only, and should be considered non-limiting.Numerous variations, changes, and substitutions will now occur to thoseskilled in the art without departing from the present disclosure. Itshould be understood that various alternatives to the embodimentsdescribed herein may be employed in practicing the scope of the presentdisclosure and claims. It is intended that the specification beconsidered as exemplary only, with the claims being entitled to theirfull breadth and scope, including equivalents.

Embodiments may be in accordance with any of the following numberedclauses:

1. A method of natural language processing and searching for identifyingbiological products in an electronic document, the method comprising:

extracting, from the electronic document, a candidate text phraserepresenting a potential biological product reference in the electronicdocument;

parsing the candidate text phrase into a syntactic structure includingone or more terms, wherein the parsing filters the one or more terms inthe syntactic structure according to a syntactic role of the one or moreterms relative to a technical field associated with the potentialbiological product reference;

tagging each of the one or more terms in the syntactic structure with avocabulary tag, wherein the vocabulary tag represents a technicalmeaning of a term in the potential biological product reference;

calculating a total score for the candidate text phrase based onrelative tag scores associated with each vocabulary tag for the one ormore terms, wherein the relative tag scores represent a relativeconfidence strength of each vocabulary tag in the potential biologicalproduct reference;

classifying the candidate text phrase as a biological product referencebased on the total score exceeding a threshold; and

searching a database for one or more product entries based on thebiological product references.

2. The method of clause 1, the method further comprising: providing oneor more product recommendations for the biological product referencebased on the one or more product entries retrieved from the database.

3. The method of clause 2, wherein providing the one or more productrecommendation comprises:

replacing or supplementing the biological product reference in theelectronic document with a link to details of the productrecommendation.

4. The method of clause 1, wherein the biological product referencecomprises an antibody product reference.

5. The method of clause 1, wherein parsing the candidate text phraseinto the syntactic structure comprises:

determining at least one of the one or more terms in the syntacticstructure that are misidentified in the syntactic structure according toa conventional part-of-speech; and

assigning a corrected identification to the at least one of the one ormore terms in the syntactic structure according to a technical syntacticrole of the at least one of the one or more terms in the potentialbiological product reference.

6. The method of clause 1, wherein calculating the total score for thecandidate text phrase comprises:

calculating a sum of the relative tag scores associated with eachvocabulary tag for the one or more terms; and

calculating the total score by dividing the sum of the relative tagscores by a total possible score.

7. The method of clause 1, wherein tagging each of the one or more termsin the syntactic structure with the vocabulary tag comprises:

comparing each of the one or more terms in the syntactic structure to aterm scoring dictionary associated with the technical field.

8. A non-transitory computer readable medium storing instructions forperforming a method of natural language processing and searching foridentifying biological products in an electronic document, the methodcomprising:

extracting, from the electronic document, a candidate text phraserepresenting a potential biological product reference in the electronicdocument;

parsing the candidate text phrase into a syntactic structure includingone or more terms, wherein the parsing filters the one or more terms inthe syntactic structure according to a syntactic role of the one or moreterms relative to a technical field associated with the potentialbiological product reference;

tagging each of the one or more terms in the syntactic structure with avocabulary tag, wherein the vocabulary tag represents a technicalmeaning of a term in the potential biological product reference;

calculating a total score for the candidate text phrase based onrelative tag scores associated with each vocabulary tag for the one ormore terms, wherein the relative tag score represents a relativeconfidence strength of each vocabulary tag in the potential biologicalproduct reference;

classifying the candidate text phrase as a biological product referencebased on the total score exceeding a threshold; and

searching a database for one or more product entries based on thebiological product references.

9. The non-transitory computer readable medium of clause 8, the methodfurther comprising:

providing one or more product recommendations for the biological productreference based on the one or more product entries retrieved from thedatabase.

10. The non-transitory computer readable medium of clause 9, whereinproviding the one or more product recommendation comprises:

replacing or supplementing the biological product reference in theelectronic document with a link to details of the productrecommendation.

11. The non-transitory computer readable medium of clause 8, wherein thebiological product reference comprises an antibody product reference.

12. The non-transitory computer readable medium of clause 8, whereinparsing the candidate text phrase into the syntactic structurecomprises:

determining at least one of the one or more terms in the syntacticstructure that are misidentified in the syntactic structure according toa conventional part-of-speech; and

assigning a corrected identification to the at least one of the one ormore terms in the syntactic structure according to a technical syntacticrole of the at least one of the one or more terms in the potentialbiological product reference.

13. The non-transitory computer readable medium of clause 8, whereincalculating the total score for the candidate text phrase comprises:

calculating a sum of the relative tag scores associated with eachvocabulary tag for the one or more terms; and

calculating the total score by dividing the sum of the relative tagscores by a total possible score.

14. The non-transitory computer readable medium of clause 8, whereintagging each of the one or more terms in the syntactic structure withthe vocabulary tag comprises:

comparing each of the one or more terms in the syntactic structure to aterm scoring dictionary associated with the technical field.

15. A system comprising: one or more memory devices storinginstructions; and

one or more processors coupled to the one or more memory devices andconfigured to execute the instruction to perform a method of naturallanguage processing and searching for identifying biological products inan electronic document, the method comprising:

extracting, from the electronic document, a candidate text phraserepresenting a potential biological product reference in the electronicdocument,

parsing the candidate text phrase into a syntactic structure includingone or more terms, wherein the parsing filters the one or more terms inthe syntactic structure according to a syntactic role of the one or moreterms relative to a technical field associated with the potentialbiological product reference,

tagging each of the one or more terms in the syntactic structure with avocabulary tag, wherein the vocabulary tag represents a technicalmeaning of a term in the potential biological product reference,

calculating a total score for the candidate text phrase based onrelative tag scores associated with each vocabulary tag for the one ormore terms, wherein the relative tag scores represent a relativeconfidence strength of each vocabulary tag in the potential biologicalproduct reference,

classifying the candidate text phrase as a biological product referencebased on the total score exceeding a threshold, and

searching a database for one or more product entries based on thebiological product references.

16. The system of clause 15, the method further comprising:

providing one or more product recommendations for the biological productreference based on the one or more product entries retrieved from thedatabase, wherein providing the one or more product recommendation,comprises:

replacing or supplementing the biological product reference in theelectronic document with a link to details of the productrecommendation.

17. The system of clause 16, wherein the biological product referencecomprises an antibody product reference.

18. The system of clause 15, wherein parsing the candidate text phraseinto the syntactic structure comprises:

determining at least one of the one or more terms in the syntacticstructure that are misidentified in the syntactic structure according toa conventional part-of-speech; and

assigning a corrected identification to the at least one of the one ormore terms in the syntactic structure according to a technical syntacticrole of the at least one of the one or more terms in the potentialbiological product reference.

19. The system of clause 15, wherein calculating the total score for thecandidate text phrase comprises:

calculating a sum of the relative tag scores associated with eachvocabulary tag for the one or more terms; and

calculating the total score by dividing the sum of the relative tagscores by a total possible score.

20. The system of clause 15, wherein tagging each of the one or moreterms in the syntactic structure with the vocabulary tag comprises:

comparing each of the one or more terms in the syntactic structure to aterm scoring dictionary associated with the technical field.

What is claimed is:
 1. A method of natural language processing andsearching for identifying biological products in an electronic document,the method comprising: extracting, from the electronic document, acandidate text phrase representing a potential biological productreference in the electronic document; parsing the candidate text phraseinto a syntactic structure including one or more terms, wherein theparsing filters the one or more terms in the syntactic structureaccording to a syntactic role of the one or more terms relative to atechnical field associated with the potential biological productreference; tagging each of the one or more terms in the syntacticstructure with a vocabulary tag, wherein the vocabulary tag represents atechnical meaning of a term in the potential biological productreference; calculating a total score for the candidate text phrase basedon relative tag scores associated with each vocabulary tag for the oneor more terms, wherein the relative tag scores represent a relativeconfidence strength of each vocabulary tag in the potential biologicalproduct reference; classifying the candidate text phrase as a biologicalproduct reference based on the total score exceeding a threshold; andsearching a database for one or more product entries based on thebiological product references.
 2. The method of claim 1, the methodfurther comprising: providing one or more product recommendations forthe biological product reference based on the one or more productentries retrieved from the database.
 3. The method of claim 2, whereinproviding the one or more product recommendation comprises: replacing orsupplementing the biological product reference in the electronicdocument with a link to details of the product recommendation.
 4. Themethod of claim 1, wherein the biological product reference comprises anantibody product reference.
 5. The method of claim 1, wherein parsingthe candidate text phrase into the syntactic structure comprises:determining at least one of the one or more terms in the syntacticstructure that are misidentified in the syntactic structure according toa conventional part-of-speech; and assigning a corrected identificationto the at least one of the one or more terms in the syntactic structureaccording to a technical syntactic role of the at least one of the oneor more terms in the potential biological product reference.
 6. Themethod of claim 1, wherein calculating the total score for the candidatetext phrase comprises: calculating a sum of the relative tag scoresassociated with each vocabulary tag for the one or more terms; andcalculating the total score by dividing the sum of the relative tagscores by a total possible score.
 7. The method of claim 1, whereintagging each of the one or more terms in the syntactic structure withthe vocabulary tag comprises: comparing each of the one or more terms inthe syntactic structure to a term scoring dictionary associated with thetechnical field.
 8. A non-transitory computer readable medium storinginstructions for performing a method of natural language processing andsearching for identifying biological products in an electronic document,the method comprising: extracting, from the electronic document, acandidate text phrase representing a potential biological productreference in the electronic document; parsing the candidate text phraseinto a syntactic structure including one or more terms, wherein theparsing filters the one or more terms in the syntactic structureaccording to a syntactic role of the one or more terms relative to atechnical field associated with the potential biological productreference; tagging each of the one or more terms in the syntacticstructure with a vocabulary tag, wherein the vocabulary tag represents atechnical meaning of a term in the potential biological productreference; calculating a total score for the candidate text phrase basedon relative tag scores associated with each vocabulary tag for the oneor more terms, wherein the relative tag score represents a relativeconfidence strength of each vocabulary tag in the potential biologicalproduct reference; classifying the candidate text phrase as a biologicalproduct reference based on the total score exceeding a threshold; andsearching a database for one or more product entries based on thebiological product references.
 9. The non-transitory computer readablemedium of claim 8, the method further comprising: providing one or moreproduct recommendations for the biological product reference based onthe one or more product entries retrieved from the database.
 10. Thenon-transitory computer readable medium of claim 9, wherein providingthe one or more product recommendation comprises: replacing orsupplementing the biological product reference in the electronicdocument with a link to details of the product recommendation.
 11. Thenon-transitory computer readable medium of claim 8, wherein thebiological product reference comprises an antibody product reference.12. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 8, whereinparsing the candidate text phrase into the syntactic structurecomprises: determining at least one of the one or more terms in thesyntactic structure that are misidentified in the syntactic structureaccording to a conventional part-of-speech; and assigning a correctedidentification to the at least one of the one or more terms in thesyntactic structure according to a technical syntactic role of the atleast one of the one or more terms in the potential biological productreference.
 13. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 8,wherein calculating the total score for the candidate text phrasecomprises: calculating a sum of the relative tag scores associated witheach vocabulary tag for the one or more terms; and calculating the totalscore by dividing the sum of the relative tag scores by a total possiblescore.
 14. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 8,wherein tagging each of the one or more terms in the syntactic structurewith the vocabulary tag comprises: comparing each of the one or moreterms in the syntactic structure to a term scoring dictionary associatedwith the technical field.
 15. A system comprising: one or more memorydevices storing instructions; and one or more processors coupled to theone or more memory devices and configured to execute the instruction toperform a method of natural language processing and searching foridentifying biological products in an electronic document, the methodcomprising: extracting, from the electronic document, a candidate textphrase representing a potential biological product reference in theelectronic document, parsing the candidate text phrase into a syntacticstructure including one or more terms, wherein the parsing filters theone or more terms in the syntactic structure according to a syntacticrole of the one or more terms relative to a technical field associatedwith the potential biological product reference, tagging each of the oneor more terms in the syntactic structure with a vocabulary tag, whereinthe vocabulary tag represents a technical meaning of a term in thepotential biological product reference, calculating a total score forthe candidate text phrase based on relative tag scores associated witheach vocabulary tag for the one or more terms, wherein the relative tagscores represent a relative confidence strength of each vocabulary tagin the potential biological product reference, classifying the candidatetext phrase as a biological product reference based on the total scoreexceeding a threshold, and searching a database for one or more productentries based on the biological product references.
 16. The system ofclaim 15, the method further comprising: providing one or more productrecommendations for the biological product reference based on the one ormore product entries retrieved from the database, wherein providing theone or more product recommendation, comprises: replacing orsupplementing the biological product reference in the electronicdocument with a link to details of the product recommendation.
 17. Thesystem of claim 16, wherein the biological product reference comprisesan antibody product reference.
 18. The system of claim 15, whereinparsing the candidate text phrase into the syntactic structurecomprises: determining at least one of the one or more terms in thesyntactic structure that are misidentified in the syntactic structureaccording to a conventional part-of-speech; and assigning a correctedidentification to the at least one of the one or more terms in thesyntactic structure according to a technical syntactic role of the atleast one of the one or more terms in the potential biological productreference.
 19. The system of claim 15, wherein calculating the totalscore for the candidate text phrase comprises: calculating a sum of therelative tag scores associated with each vocabulary tag for the one ormore terms; and calculating the total score by dividing the sum of therelative tag scores by a total possible score.
 20. The system of claim15, wherein tagging each of the one or more terms in the syntacticstructure with the vocabulary tag comprises: comparing each of the oneor more terms in the syntactic structure to a term scoring dictionaryassociated with the technical field.